La Trobe
57721_Leibold,J_2016.pdf (584.9 kB)

Islamic Veiling in Xinjiang: The Political and Societal Struggle to Define Uyghur Female Adornment

Download (584.9 kB)
Version 2 2020-11-30, 06:22
Version 1 2020-11-26, 06:21
journal contribution
posted on 2020-11-30, 06:12 authored by James LeiboldJames Leibold, T Grose
https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/683283
© 2016 by The Australian National University. All rights reserved. The Islamic veil is arguably the most politicized piece of fabric in the world, eliciting heated debate over its significance and complex meanings. The over 10 million Muslim women in China have their own histories and cultures of veiling. This article explores the ongoing struggle between the Chinese Communist Party and Xinjiang’s Uyghur Muslim minority over the right to define what is “appropriate” and “normal” female adornment. New styles of veiling have entered China from abroad, intensifying the controversy over the scope of Uyghur ethnic attire. We contrast the party-state’s antiveiling campaign to eliminate popular styles in Xinjiang, with the diverse reasons and meanings Uyghur women and men attach to them. While the party-state strives to control and standardize Uyghur dress, the community itself responds, sometimes defiantly, with a complex registry of veiling practices that reflect everything from ethnonational resistance, increased religious faith, and global Islamic haute couture.

History

Publication Date

2016-07-16

Journal

The China Journal

Volume

76

Pagination

25p. (p. 78-102)

Publisher

University of Chicago Press

ISSN

1324-9347

Rights Statement

The Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.

Usage metrics

    Journal Articles

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC