posted on 2023-01-18, 16:46authored byWilliam Henning James Hebblewhite
Submission note: In total fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts to the Department of Politics, Philosophy and Legal Studies, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora.
In this thesis I argue that the Marxist philosophy of Louis Althusser is still an important, innovative interpretation of Marxism that deserves to be taken seriously. Since the decline in the popularity of Althusserianism in the 1970s, alternative socialist theories have been developed, which are widely regarded as superior to Althusser’s theory. I argue that this view is mistaken, highlighting the advantages of Althusser’s approach, and critiquing the work of G.A. Cohen, Ernesto Laclau, and Chantal Mouffe, who put forward influential alternatives to Althusser’s theory. Although these alternative theories opened up interesting new areas of debate, they also have significant inadequacies. In particular, they fail to present an adequate account of the societal structure. These weaknesses are largely avoided by Althusser, who presents a more complex theory of the societal structure built around the notions of structural causality and overdetermination.
History
Center or Department
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. Department of Politics, Philosophy and Legal Studies.
Thesis type
Masters
Awarding institution
La Trobe University
Year Awarded
2013
Rights Statement
The thesis author retains all proprietary rights (such as copyright and patent rights) over the content of this thesis, and has granted La Trobe University permission to reproduce and communicate this version of the thesis. The author has declared that any third party copyright material contained within the thesis made available here is reproduced and communicated with permission. If you believe that any material has been made available without permission of the copyright owner please contact us with the details.