La Trobe

A review of digital health interventions to support breastfeeding in low- and middle-income countries

Download (870.28 kB)
Version 2 2025-02-19, 05:08
Version 1 2025-02-19, 03:22
report
posted on 2025-02-19, 05:08 authored by Erfina Erfina, Sarena Haji HashimSarena Haji Hashim, Kolsoom SafariKolsoom Safari, Shannon BennettsShannon Bennetts, Christine EastChristine East

Aim: To describe research on digital health interventions designed to support breastfeeding in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Design: Literature review.

Methods: Pre-specified searches were conducted in three databases. Included studies were assessed using the mHealth Evidence Reporting and Assessment (mERA) checklist to evaluate the quality and completeness of reporting (total score 0-16). Critical appraisal was conducted following the Quality Assessment Tool for Diverse Studies (QuADS, percentage of criteria met from total score 0-39). Extracted data were synthesised based on country, primary concept, methodology, demographics, main findings, and intervention type.

Data Sources: Medline, CINAHL, and ProQuest (January 1989 to January 2024).

Results: Twenty-nine studies were included that described digital health interventions for breastfeeding support in LMICs. Digital interventions included one or more of: websites and mobile apps (14 studies), text messages (9 studies) and postnatal telehealth follow-up and education by mobile phone (8 studies). These interventions were designed to support breastfeeding initiation and continuation rates by providing timely information, support, and reminders. Challenges included high attrition rates, limited access to technology and inadequate integration with existing health systems. Quality and completeness of intervention reporting was variable according to the mERA (median = 11 range: 8-15). Methodological and reporting quality was generally high according to the QuADS (median 97%, range 79-100%).

Conclusion: While digital health interventions show promise for breastfeeding support in LMICs, challenges such as technology access disparities, limited health system integration, and inconsistent reporting standards remain. Future research should explore cost-effectiveness, contextual adaptability, and user experience to enhance intervention scalability. The mERA checklist offers a useful framework for reporting digital health interventions, supporting replicability and sustainability.

History

Publication Date

2025-02-01

Type of report

  • Other research report

Publisher

La Trobe University

Place of publication

Melbourne, Australia

Pagination

44p.

Rights Statement

© La Trobe University, 2025. This report may be downloaded for personal use only. Permission to reproduce this report must be sought from La Trobe University.

Usage metrics

    Research Reports

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC