La Trobe

File(s) not publicly available

Reason: Article is restricted access

Women's views of postnatal care in the context of the increasing pressure on postnatal beds in Australia

Version 2 2024-11-12, 05:54
Version 1 2024-01-10, 01:41
journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-12, 05:54 authored by Helen McLachlanHelen McLachlan, L Gold, Della ForsterDella Forster, J Yelland, Jo-Anne RaynerJo-Anne Rayner, S Rayner
Background: Despite limited evidence evaluating early postnatal discharge, length of hospital stay has declined dramatically in Australia since the 1980s. The recent rising birth rate in Victoria, Australia has increased pressure on hospital beds, and many services have responded by discharging women earlier than planned, often with little preparation during pregnancy. We aimed to explore the views of women and their partners regarding a number of theoretical postnatal care 'packages' that could provide an alternative approach to early postnatal care. Methods: Eight focus groups and four interviews were held in rural and metropolitan Victoria in 2006 with participants who had experienced a mix of public and private maternity care. These included 8 pregnant women, 42 recent mothers and 2 male partners. All were fluent in English. Focus groups explored participants' experiences and/or expectations of early postnatal care in hospital and at home and their views of alternative packages of postnatal care where location of care shifted from hospital to home and/or hotel. This paper describes the packages and explores and describes what 'value' women placed on the various components of care. Findings: Overall, women expressed a preference for what they had experienced or expected, which may be explained by the 'what is must be best' phenomenon where women place value on the status quo. They generally did not respond favourably towards the alternative postnatal care packages, with concerns about any shorter length of hospital stay, especially for first time mothers. Women were concerned about the safety and wellbeing of their new baby and reported that they lacked confidence in their ability to care for their baby. The physical presence and availability of professional support was seen to alleviate these concerns, especially for first time mothers. Participants did not believe that increased domiciliary visits compensated for forgoing the perceived security and value of staying in hospital. Women generally valued staying in hospital for the length of time they felt they needed above all other factors. Key conclusions and implications for practice: Women were concerned about shortened postnatal length of hospital stay and these concerns must be considered when changes are planned in maternity service provision. Any moves towards shorter postnatal length of stay must be comprehensively evaluated with consideration given to exploring consumer views and satisfaction. There is also a need for flexibility in postnatal care that acknowledges women's individual needs. © 2009 Australian College of Midwives.

Funding

This study was supported by a Fred Bauer Project Grant from the Australasian College of Dermatology. Ceragenix provided the study intervention (EpiCeram™) without cost to the study. AL, SD and LG are currently supported by the Australian National Health & Medical Research Council. KA is supported by a Sylvia Viertal Fellowship.

History

Publication Date

2009-12-01

Journal

Women and Birth

Volume

22

Issue

4

Pagination

5p. (p. 128-133)

Publisher

Elsevier BV

ISSN

1871-5192

Rights Statement

© 2009 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Australia (a division of Reed International Books Australia Pty Ltd). All rights reserved

Usage metrics

    Journal Articles

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC