La Trobe

Why the geosciences are becoming increasingly vital to the interpretation of the human evolutionary record

Download (620.48 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-02-17, 04:56 authored by Mike W Morley, Ian Moffat, Anna M Kotarba-Morley, Vito C Hernandez, Andrea Zerboni, Andrew HerriesAndrew Herries, Renaud Joannes-Boyau, Kira Westaway
Advanced geoscience techniques are essential to contextualize fossils, artefacts and other archaeologically important material accurately and effectively. Their appropriate use will increase confidence in new interpretations of the fossil and archaeological record, providing important information about the life and depositional history of these materials and so should form an integral component of all human evolutionary studies. Many of the most remarkable recent finds that have transformed the field of human evolution are small and scarce, ranging in size from teeth to strands of DNA, recovered from complex sedimentary environments. Nevertheless, if properly analysed, they hold immense potential to rewrite what we know about the evolution of our species and our closest hominin ancestors.

Funding

M.W.M., I.M., A.M.K.-M., A.I.R.H., R.J.-B. and K.W. receive funding support from the Australian Research Council (ARC), through Future Fellowships FT180100309 (M.W.M.) and FT220100184 (I.M.), Linkage Project LP210300105 (A.M.K.-M.), and Discovery Projects DP170100056 (A.I.R.H.), DP220100195 (R.J.-B.) and DP170101597 (K.W.). V.C.H. receives funding support through a Flinders International Postgraduate Research Scholarship. A.Z. receives funding support from the SPHeritage Project (MUR Grant FISR2019_00040).

History

Publication Date

2023-12-01

Journal

Nature Ecology & Evolution

Volume

7

Pagination

1971 - 1977

Publisher

Springer Nature

ISSN

2397-334X

Rights Statement

© Springer Nature Limited 2023 This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02215-5

Usage metrics

    Journal Articles

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC