Where Does Value Lie in Peer Support? An Exploratory Discussion of the Theories and Methods Underpinning Effective Research in Peer Support
journal contributionposted on 01.06.2021, 06:59 by C Walker, Chris PetersonChris Peterson
© The Author(s) 2020. A literature review was undertaken in 2019 to review research into the effectiveness of peer support in chronic disease self-management. As with an earlier literature review, we found the results disappointing due to poor reporting and poor research design. Lack of information on training of peer supporters, unrealistically short timeframes to produce changes in health behaviors, and lack of any theoretical underpinning of the research design contributed to rating randomized controlled trials as poor to medium quality evidence. At the same time, systematic reviews consider peer support as effective, arguing that improved research design and evaluation would demonstrate this. This article discusses the need to examine more closely the contribution of peer support to chronic disease care as well as considering how research methods might more closely reflect that contribution and provide better evidence of the value of peer support to both participants and the health system.
JournalQualitative Health Research
Rights StatementWalker C, Peterson CL. Where Does Value Lie in Peer Support? An Exploratory Discussion of the Theories and Methods Underpinning Effective Research in Peer Support. Qualitative Health Research (October 2020) pp. 1-10. Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). doi:10.1177/1049732320964173. The Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.
Science & TechnologySocial SciencesTechnologyInformation Science & Library ScienceSocial Sciences, InterdisciplinarySocial Sciences, BiomedicalSocial Sciences - Other TopicsBiomedical Social Sciencespeer supportrandomized controlled trialssystematic reviewsresearch methodsqualitativeAustraliaRANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALSCOMPLEX INTERVENTIONSMENTAL-ILLNESSHEALTHPEOPLEIMPROVEDEPRESSIONBEHAVIORSNursing