La Trobe
1169314_Reifels,L_2021.pdf (335.91 kB)

What works in community-led suicide prevention: Perspectives of wesley lifeforce network coordinators

Download (335.91 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2021-07-13, 04:25 authored by L Reifels, Amy MorganAmy Morgan, LS Too, M Schlichthorst, M Williamson, H Jordan
Community coalitions have been recognised as an important vehicle to advance health promotion and address relevant local health issues in communities, yet little is known about their effectiveness in the field of suicide prevention. The Wesley Lifeforce Suicide Prevention Networks program consists of a national cohort of local community-led suicide prevention networks. This study drew on a nationally representative survey and the perspectives of coordinators of these networks to identify the key factors underpinning positive perceived network member and community outcomes. Survey data were analysed through descriptive statistics and linear regression analyses. Networks typically reported better outcomes for network members and communities if they had been in existence for longer, had a focus on the general community, and had conducted more network meetings and internal processes, as well as specific community-focused activities. Study findings strengthen the evidence base for effective network operations and lend further support to the merit of community coalitions in the field of suicide prevention, with implications for similar initiatives, policymakers, and wider sector stakeholders seeking to address suicide prevention issues at a local community level.

Funding

This research was funded by Wesley Mission.

History

Publication Date

2021-06-01

Journal

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Volume

18

Issue

11

Article Number

ARTN 6084

Pagination

14p.

Publisher

MDPI

ISSN

1661-7827

Rights Statement

The Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.

Usage metrics

    Journal Articles

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC