La Trobe
1161337_Carruthers,S_2021.pdf (642.66 kB)

Utility of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule and the Brief Observation of Social and Communication Change for Measuring Outcomes for a Parent-Mediated Early Autism Intervention

Download (642.66 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 21.04.2021, 06:16 by S Carruthers, T Charman, N El Hawi, YA Kim, R Randle, C Lord, A Pickles, J Green, C Aldred, B Barrett, S Barron, K Beggs, L Blazey, K Bourne, S Byford, J Collino, A Cutress, C Harrop, T Houghton, P Howlin, Kristelle Hudry, A Le Couteur, S Leach, K Leadbitter, W MacDonald, H McConachie, S Randles, V Slonims, C Taylor, K Temple, L White
Measuring outcomes for autistic children following social communication interventions is an ongoing challenge given the heterogeneous changes, which can be subtle. We tested and compared the overall and item-level intervention effects of the Brief Observation of Social Communication Change (BOSCC), Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS-2) algorithm, and ADOS-2 Calibrated Severity Scores (CSS) with autistic children aged 2–5 years from the Preschool Autism Communication Trial (PACT). The BOSCC was applied to Module 1 ADOS assessments (ADOS-BOSCC). Among the 117 children using single or no words (Module 1), the ADOS-BOSCC, ADOS algorithm, and ADOS CSS each detected small non-significant intervention effects. However, on the ADOS algorithm, there was a medium significant intervention effect for children with “few to no words” at baseline, while children with “some words” showed little intervention effect. For the full PACT sample (including ADOS Module 2, total n=152), ADOS metrics evidenced significant small (CSS) and medium (algorithm) overall intervention effects. None of the Module 1 item-level intervention effects reached significance, with largest changes observed for Gesture (ADOS-BOSCC and ADOS), Facial Expressions (ADOS), and Intonation (ADOS). Significant ADOS Module 2 item-level effects were observed for Mannerisms and Repetitive Interests and Stereotyped Behaviors. Despite strong psychometric properties, the ADOS-BOSCC was not more sensitive to behavioral changes than the ADOS among Module 1 children. Our results suggest the ADOS can be a sensitive outcome measure. Item-level intervention effect plots have the potential to indicate intervention “signatures of change,” a concept that may be useful in future trials and systematic reviews. Lay Summary: This study compares two outcome measures in a parent-mediated therapy. Neither was clearly better or worse than the other; however, the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule produced somewhat clearer evidence than the Brief Observation of Social Communication Change of improvement among children who had use of “few to no” words at the start. We explore which particular behaviors are associated with greater improvement. These findings can inform researchers when they consider how best to explore the impact of their intervention.

Funding

The authors gratefully thank all families who participated in the study. The authors thank also to Rebecca Grzadzinski and Sophy Kim for their time and input into training and discussion. The members of the Preschool Autism Communication Trial (PACT) Consortium are: Jonathan Green, Catherine Aldred, Barbara Barrett, Sam Barron, Karen Beggs, Laura Blazey, Katy Bourne, Sarah Byford, Julia Collino, Anna Cutress, Clare Harrop, Tori Houghton, Pat Howlin, Kristelle Hudry, Ann Le Couteur, Sue Leach, Kathy Leadbitter, Wendy MacDonald, Helen McConachie, Sarah Randles, Vicky Slonims, Carol Taylor, Kathryn Temple, Lydia White. PACT was funded by the Medical Research Council (G0401546), the UK Department for Children, Schools and Families; with a UK Department of Health award for excess treatment and support costs. S.C. is supported by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) (MR/N013700/1) and is a King's College London member of the MRC Doctoral Training Partnership in Biomedical Sciences. S.C., T.C., and A.P. are members of the PACT-G Consortium, funded by the NIHR/MRC EME Program (13/119/18). A.P. is partially supported by National Institute of Health Research NF-SI-0617-10120 and Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the UK NHS, NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care. C.L. is supported by the National Institute of Health (5R01HD081199-06). C.L. receives royalties from the sale of the ADOS-2 and ADI. No other authors have conflicts of interest.

History

Publication Date

01/02/2021

Journal

Autism Research

Volume

14

Issue

2

Pagination

(p. 411-425)

Publisher

Wiley

ISSN

1939-3792

Rights Statement

The Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.

Licence

Exports