La Trobe

Using audit and feedback to increase clinician adherence to clinical practice guidelines in brain injury rehabilitation: A before and after study

journal contribution
posted on 2024-12-19, 04:35 authored by Laura Jolliffe, Jacqui Morarty, Tammy Hoffmann, Maria Crotty, Peter Hunter, Ian D Cameron, Xia LiXia Li, Natasha LanninNatasha Lannin

Objective: This study evaluated whether frequent (fortnightly) audit and feedback cycles over a sustained period of time (>12 months) increased clinician adherence to recommended guidelines in acquired brain injury rehabilitation.

Design: A before and after study design.

Setting: A metropolitan inpatient brain injury rehabilitation unit.

Participants: Clinicians; medical, nursing and allied health staff. Interventions Fortnightly cycles of audit and feedback for 14 months. Each fortnight, medical file and observational audits were completed against 114 clinical indicators.

Main outcome measure: Adherence to guideline indicators before and after intervention, calculated by proportions, Mann-Whitney U and Chi square analysis.

Results: Clinical and statistical significant improvements in median clinical indicator adherence were found immediately following the audit and feedback program from 38.8% (95% CI 34.3 to 44.4) to 83.6% (95% CI 81.8 to 88.5). Three months after cessation of the intervention, median adherence had decreased from 82.3% to 76.6% (95% CI 72.7 to 83.3, p<0.01). Findings suggest that there are individual indicators which are more amenable to change using an audit and feedback program.

Conclusion: A fortnightly audit and feedback program increased clinicians’ adherence to guideline recommendations in an inpatient acquired brain injury rehabilitation setting. We propose future studies build on the evidence-based method used in the present study to determine effectiveness and develop an implementation toolkit for scale-up.

Funding

This project was funded by the Transport Accident Commission (GNT108), through the Institute for Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research. The following authors were supported to conduct this research by fellowship grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC): NAL (GNT1112158); LJ (GNT1114522); IDC (GNT1110493), and Heart Foundation (Australia): NAL (GNT102055). There are no conflicts of interest to declare. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

History

Publication Date

2019-01-01

Journal

PLoS One

Volume

14

Issue

3

Article Number

e0213525

Pagination

19p.

Publisher

Public Library of Science

ISSN

1932-6203

Rights Statement

© 2019 Jolliffe et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.