Treatment dose in post-stroke aphasia: A systematic scoping review
journal contributionposted on 12.04.2021, 00:06 by Samuel HarveySamuel Harvey, Marcella CarragherMarcella Carragher, MW Dickey, John PierceJohn Pierce, Miranda RoseMiranda Rose
Little is known about how the amount of treatment a person with aphasia receives impacts aphasia recovery following stroke, yet this information is vital to ensure effective treatments are delivered efficiently. Furthermore, there is no standard dose terminology in the stroke rehabilitation or aphasia literature. This scoping review aims to systematically map the evidence regarding dose in treatments for post-stroke aphasia and to explore how treatment dose is conceptualized, measured and reported in the literature. A comprehensive search was undertaken in June 2019. One hundred and twelve intervention studies were reviewed. Treatment dose (amount of treatment) has been conceptualized as both a measure of time and a count of discrete therapeutic elements. Doses ranged from one to 100 hours, while some studies reported session doses of up to 420 therapeutic inputs per session. Studies employ a wide variety of treatment schedules (i.e., session dose, session frequency, and intervention duration) and the interaction of dose parameters may impact the dose–response relationship. High dose interventions delivered over short periods may improve treatment efficiency while maintaining efficacy. Person- and treatment-level factors that mediate tolerance of high dose interventions require further investigation. Systematic exploration of dose–response relationships in post-stroke aphasia treatment is required.
This work was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship and the NHMRC funded Centre for Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation (#1153236).
PublisherTaylor & Francis
Rights StatementThe Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.
Science & TechnologySocial SciencesLife Sciences & BiomedicineNeurosciencesPsychologyNeurosciences & NeurologyAphasiaStrokeRehabilitationDoseScoping reviewCONSTRAINT-INDUCED APHASIASEMANTIC FEATURE ANALYSISINTENSIVE SPEECH-THERAPYINDUCED LANGUAGE THERAPYQUALITY-OF-LIFERANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALNONFLUENT APHASIAREHABILITATION PROGRAMSENTENCE PRODUCTIONWORD COMPREHENSION