La Trobe

File(s) under embargo

1

year(s)

4

month(s)

10

day(s)

until file(s) become available

The Problem of the Subject: The Politics of Post-mortem Rights in the Aftermath of Drug-related Deaths

journal contribution
posted on 10.11.2021, 02:41 authored by Kathryn SeearKathryn Seear, Suzanne FraserSuzanne Fraser, A Madden
In recent years, drug-related deaths have soared around the world. Some of these are overdose deaths, some are due to state violence as part of the ‘war on drugs’. Images of these deaths are often widely circulated in mainstream and social media. They are mobilised by anti-drug campaigners, anti-prohibitionists, family members seeking to memorialise their loved ones, and researchers. In all of these instances, of course, there is no question about whether the dead can consent to the sharing of such images, for they are no longer alive to do so. Where consent is not possible, how should the sharing of such images be approached? This article explores this issue. We focus on two concepts often mobilised when assessing the validity of post-mortem rights claims: shame, and what we call dignity-as-reputation. Through an analysis of two case studies of drug-related death, we explain why these concepts are an inadequate framework for assessing what is at stake within the specific and unique context of drug-related deaths. We argue that posthumanist legal theory and feminist scholarship on emotions provide an alternative foundation for legal approaches to images of death, and argue that post-mortem rights should be reworked.

History

Publication Date

17/05/2021

Journal

Australian Feminist Law Journal

Pagination

20p.

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

ISSN

1320-0968

Rights Statement

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in the Australian Feminist Law Journal on 17 May 2021, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13200968.2021.1885201 The Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.

Usage metrics

Categories

Exports