La Trobe
1182608_Stewart,AC_2021.pdf (556.89 kB)
Download file

Strategies to maximise study retention and limit attrition bias in a prospective cohort study of men reporting a history of injecting drug use released from prison: the prison and transition health study

Download (556.89 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 06.10.2021, 03:44 authored by Ashleigh StewartAshleigh Stewart, R Cossar, S Walker, AL Wilkinson, B Quinn, Paul DietzePaul Dietze, R Winter, A Kirwan, M Curtis, JRP Ogloff, S Kinner, C Aitken, T Butler, E Woods, M Stoové
Background: There are significant challenges associated with studies of people released from custodial settings, including loss to follow-up in the community. Interpretation of findings with consideration of differences between those followed up and those not followed up is critical in the development of evidence-informed policies and practices. We describe attrition bias in the Prison and Transition Health (PATH) prospective cohort study, and strategies employed to minimise attrition. Methods: PATH involves 400 men with a history of injecting drug use recruited from three prisons in Victoria, Australia. Four interviews were conducted: one pre-release (‘baseline’) and three interviews at approximately 3, 12, and 24 months post-release (‘follow-up’). We assessed differences in baseline characteristics between those retained and not retained in the study, reporting mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Results: Most participants (85%) completed at least one follow-up interview and 162 (42%) completed all three follow-up interviews. Retained participants were younger than those lost to follow-up (mean diff − 3.1 years, 95% CI -5.3, − 0.9). There were no other statistically significant differences observed in baseline characteristics. Conclusion: The high proportion of participants retained in the PATH cohort study via comprehensive follow-up procedures, coupled with extensive record linkage to a range of administrative datasets, is a considerable strength of the study. Our findings highlight how strategic and comprehensive follow-up procedures, frequent contact with participants and secondary contacts, and established working relationships with the relevant government departments can improve study retention and potentially minimise attrition bias.

Funding

This work was supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Project Grant (APP1029915). MS and PD are supported by NHMRC senior research fellowships. We gratefully acknowledge the support provided to the Burnet Institute by the Victorian Government Operational Infrastructure Support Program. RC and AS are support by Research Training Program Stipend. MC is supported by an NHMRC postgraduate scholarship and Monash Addiction Research Centre PhD top-up scholarship.

History

Publication Date

12/09/2021

Journal

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Volume

21

Article Number

185

Pagination

8p.

Publisher

BMC

ISSN

1471-2288

Rights Statement

The Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.

Usage metrics

Categories

Licence

Exports