La Trobe

Stakeholder perceptions and experiences of preservice teachers’ professional readiness: some implications for initial teacher education

journal contribution
posted on 2025-11-26, 02:51 authored by Juliana RyanJuliana Ryan, Kristina TurnerKristina Turner, Rochelle FogelgarnRochelle Fogelgarn
<p dir="ltr">Globally, education reviews have spotlit professional preparation as a policy problem alongside teacher shortages and early career teacher attrition. Our study explored how preservice teacher (PST) engagement and preparation for practice are related in one Australian university, drawing on Kahu and Nelson’s framework of student engagement in the educational interface. Findings show that graduates, mentor teachers, and teacher educators had mismatched expectations about teacher education and PSTs’ preparation for practice. Reflecting the teacher education research literature, these revealed different understandings of the relationship between theory and practice in PSTs’ preparation and emphasised the situatedness of teacher professional learning. More notably, mentor teachers and teacher educators also highlighted some PSTs’ lack of engagement as a barrier to preparation for practice. We conclude with some suggestions about achieving greater coherence between teacher education and professional experience placements, focusing on expectations about attendance and participation to promote PSTs’ engagement in professional behaviours.</p>

History

Publication Date

2025-10-01

Journal

Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education

Volume

53

Issue

5

Pagination

543-557

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

ISSN

1359-866X

Rights Statement

© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.

Usage metrics

    Journal Articles

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC