posted on 2021-07-13, 23:07authored byRK Gobarani, NA Zwar, G Russell, MJ Abramson, B Bonevski, Anne Holland, E Paul, Narelle CoxNarelle Cox, S Wilson, J George
Background GPs have limited capacity to routinely provide smoking cessation support. New strategies are needed to reach all smokers within this setting. Aim To evaluate the effect of a pharmacist-coordinated interdisciplinary smoking cessation intervention delivered in Australian general practice. Design and setting Secondary analysis of a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) conducted in 41 Australian general practices. Method In all, 690 current smokers were included in this study: 373 from intervention clinics (n = 21) and 317 from control clinics (n = 18). A total of 166 current smokers had spirometry-confirmed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In the intervention clinics, trained pharmacists provided smoking cessation support plus Quitline referral. Control clinics provided usual care plus Quitline referral. Those with COPD in the intervention group (n = 84) were referred for home medicines review (HMR) and home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HomeBase), which included further smoking cessation support. Outcomes included carbon monoxide (CO)-validated smoking abstinence, self-reported use of smoking cessation aids, and differences between groups in readiness-to-quit score at 6 months. Results Intention-to-treat analysis showed similar CO-validated abstinence rates at 6 months in the intervention (4.0%) and control clinics (3.5%). No differences were observed in readiness-to-quit scores between groups at 6 months. CO-validated abstinence rates were similar in those who completed HMR and at least six sessions of HomeBase to those with COPD in usual care. Conclusion A pharmacist-coordinated interdisciplinary smoking cessation intervention when integrated in a general practice setting had no advantages over usual care. Further research is needed to evaluate the effect of HMR and home-based pulmonary rehabilitation on smoking abstinence in smokers with COPD.
Funding
The RADICALS trial received funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) through the NHMRC Partnerships for Better Health - Partnership Projects initiative (APP1076255). Cash and/or in-kind contributions were received from partner organisations: Lung Foundation Australia, Boehringer Ingelheim Pty Ltd, and Eastern Melbourne Primary Health Network (PHN).
History
Publication Date
2021-06-01
Journal
British Journal of General Practice
Volume
71
Issue
707
Pagination
(p. e458-e464)
Publisher
Royal College of General Practitioners
ISSN
0960-1643
Rights Statement
The Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.