La Trobe
- No file added yet -

Scientific evidence is just the starting point: A generalizable process for developing sports injury prevention interventions

Download (542.04 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-02-03, 02:32 authored by Alex DonaldsonAlex Donaldson, DG Lloyd, BJ Gabbe, Jillianne CookJillianne Cook, W Young, P White, CF Finch

Background: The 2 most cited sports injury prevention research frameworks incorporate intervention development, yet little guidance is available in the sports science literature on how to undertake this complex process. This paper presents a generalizable process for developing implementable sports injury prevention interventions, including a case study applying the process to develop a lower limb injury prevention exercise training program (FootyFirst) for community Australian football. Methods: The intervention development process is underpinned by 2 complementary premises: (1) that evidence-based practice integrates the best available scientific evidence with practitioner expertise and end user values and (2) that research evidence alone is insufficient to develop implementable interventions. Results: The generalizable 6-step intervention development process involves (1) compiling research evidence, clinical experience, and knowledge of the implementation context; (2) consulting with experts; (3) engaging with end users; (4) testing the intervention; (5) using theory; and (6) obtaining feedback from early implementers. Following each step, intervention content and presentation should be revised to ensure that the final intervention includes evidence-informed content that is likely to be adopted, properly implemented, and sustained over time by the targeted intervention deliverers. For FootyFirst, this process involved establishing a multidisciplinary intervention development group, conducting 2 targeted literature reviews, undertaking an online expert consensus process, conducting focus groups with program end users, testing the program multiple times in different contexts, and obtaining feedback from early implementers of the program. Conclusion: This systematic yet pragmatic and iterative intervention development process is potentially applicable to any injury prevention topic across all sports settings and levels. It will guide researchers wishing to undertake intervention development.

Funding

This study was funded by an National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Partnership Project Grant (ID: 565907) which included additional support (both cash and in-kind) from the following project partner agencies: the Australian Football League; Victorian Health Promotion Foundation; New South Wales Sporting Injuries Committee; JLT Sport, a division of Jardine Lloyd Thompson Australia Pty Ltd.; Sport and Recreation Victoria, Department of Transport, Planning and Local Infrastructure; and Sports Medicine Australia-National and Victorian Branches. Caroline Finch was supported by an NHMRC Principal Research Fellowship (APP1058737). Belinda Gabbe was supported by an NHMRC Career Development Fellowship (APP1048731). Jill Cook was supported by a NHMRC Practitioner fellowship (APP1058493). Alex Donaldson and Peta White held Research Fellowships funded through the major NHMRC Partnership Project Grant.

History

Publication Date

2016-09-01

Journal

Journal of Sport and Health Science

Volume

5

Issue

3

Pagination

8p. (p. 334-341)

Publisher

Elsevier

ISSN

2213-2961

Rights Statement

© 2016 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Shanghai University of Sport. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).