La Trobe
Gawne&Kelly_AJL_GreenOA.pdf (608.89 kB)

Revisiting significant action and gesture categorization

Download (608.89 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2020-02-18, 04:30 authored by Lauren GawneLauren Gawne, Barbara F. Kelly
As the field of gesture studies has developed researchers have created ways of analyzing and categorizing bodily movement phenomena. In this paper we look at whether gesture categorisations have any resonance with the ways that people other than gesture researchers approach bodily movement. Building on Kendon’s (1978) observations that people generally have a consistent attitude towards what constitutes ‘significant action’ we asked 12 participants to conceptualize their own categories of gesture and then analyze a short video that contained a pre-determined variety of bodily movements. We found that non-analysts had a wider conception of what constituted gesture than analysts. In regards to the categorisations of gesture that non-analysts made, there were a range of schemas, which we broadly categorised as being ‘form- based’ and ‘function based’.


Publication Date







18p. (pp. 216-233)

Rights Statement

The Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version. See:

Usage metrics

    Journal Articles