La Trobe

Return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther Symposium ACL Injury Return to Sport Consensus Group

journal contribution
posted on 2025-11-11, 00:58 authored by SJ Meredith, T Rauer, TL Chmielewski, C Fink, T Diermeier, BB Rothrauff, E Svantesson, E Hamrin Senorski, TE Hewett, SL Sherman, BP Lesniak, Mario BizziniMario Bizzini, S Chen, M Cohen, SD Villa, L Engebretsen, H Feng, M Ferretti, FH Fu, AB Imhoff, CC Kaeding, J Karlsson, R Kuroda, AD Lynch, J Menetrey, V Musahl, RA Navarro, SJ Rabuck, R Siebold, L Snyder-Mackler, T Spalding, C van Eck, D Vyas, Kate WebsterKate Webster, K Wilk
<p dir="ltr">Background: A precise and consistent definition of return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is lacking, and there is controversy surrounding the process of returning patients to sport and their previous activity level. </p><p dir="ltr">Purpose: The aim of the Panther Symposium ACL Injury Return to Sport Consensus Group was to provide a clear definition of RTS after ACL injury and a description of the RTS continuum as well as provide clinical guidance on RTS testing and decision-making. </p><p dir="ltr">Study Design: Consensus statement. Methods: An international, multidisciplinary group of ACL experts convened as part of a consensus meeting. Consensus statements were developed using a modified Delphi method. Literature review was performed to report the supporting evidence. </p><p dir="ltr">Results: Key points include that RTS is characterized by achievement of the preinjury level of sport and involves a criteria-based progression from return to participation to RTS and, ultimately, return to performance. Purely time-based RTS decision-making should be abandoned. Progression occurs along an RTS continuum, with decision-making by a multidisciplinary group that incorporates objective physical examination data and validated and peer-reviewed RTS tests, which should involve functional assessment as well as psychological readiness. Consideration should be given to biological healing, contextual factors, and concomitant injuries. </p><p dir="ltr">Conclusion: The resultant consensus statements and scientific rationale aim to inform the reader of the complex process of RTS after ACL injury that occurs along a dynamic continuum. Research is needed to determine the ideal RTS test battery, the best implementation of psychological readiness testing, and methods for the biological assessment of healing and recovery.</p>

Funding

C.F. has received research support from Zimmer Biomet, consulting fees from Karl Storz and Medacta, speaking fees from Medacta, and royalties from Karl Storz. S.L.S. has received research support from Zimmer Biomet and consulting fees from Arthrex, Conmed, Flexion Therapeutics, JRF Ortho, Olympus, Smith & Nephew, and Vericel. B.P.L. has received royalties from Wolters Kluwer Health-Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

History

Publication Date

2020-06-01

Journal

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Volume

8

Issue

6

Article Number

2325967120930829

Pagination

11p.

Publisher

SAGE

ISSN

2325-9671

Rights Statement

© The Author(s) 2020. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).