La Trobe
1301359_Tugwell,P_2023.pdf (1.1 MB)

Protocol for the development of guidance for collaborator and partner engagement in health care evidence syntheses

Download (1.1 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-12-18, 04:08 authored by P Tugwell, V Welch, O Magwood, A Todhunter-Brown, EA Akl, TW Concannon, J Khabsa, R Morley, H Schunemann, L Lytvyn, A Agarwal, A Antequera, MT Avey, P Campbell, C Chang, S Chang, L Dans, O Dewidar, D Ghersi, ID Graham, G Hazlewood, J Hilgart, T Horsley, D John, J Jull, LJ Maxwell, C McCutcheon, Z Munn, F Nonino, J Pardo Pardo, R Parker, K Pottie, G Rada, A Riddle, Anneliese SynnotAnneliese Synnot, ET Ghogomu, E Tomlinson, K Toupin-April, J Petkovic
Background: Involving collaborators and partners in research may increase relevance and uptake, while reducing health and social inequities. Collaborators and partners include people and groups interested in health research: health care providers, patients and caregivers, payers of health research, payers of health services, publishers, policymakers, researchers, product makers, program managers, and the public. Evidence syntheses inform decisions about health care services, treatments, and practice, which ultimately affect health outcomes. Our objectives are to: A. Identify, map, and synthesize qualitative and quantitative findings related to engagement in evidence syntheses B. Explore how engagement in evidence synthesis promotes health equity C. Develop equity-oriented guidance on methods for conducting, evaluating, and reporting engagement in evidence syntheses Methods: Our diverse, international team will develop guidance for engagement with collaborators and partners throughout multiple sequential steps using an integrated knowledge translation approach: 1. Reviews. We will co-produce 1 scoping review, 3 systematic reviews and 1 evidence map focusing on (a) methods, (b) barriers and facilitators, (c) conflict of interest considerations, (d) impacts, and (e) equity considerations of engagement in evidence synthesis. 2. Methods study, interviews, and survey. We will contextualise the findings of step 1 by assessing a sample of evidence syntheses reporting on engagement with collaborators and partners and through conducting interviews with collaborators and partners who have been involved in producing evidence syntheses. We will use these findings to develop draft guidance checklists and will assess agreement with each item through an international survey. 3. Consensus. The guidance checklists will be co-produced and finalised at a consensus meeting with collaborators and partners. 4. Dissemination. We will develop a dissemination plan with our collaborators and partners and work collaboratively to improve adoption of our guidance by key organizations. Conclusion: Our international team will develop guidance for collaborator and partner engagement in health care evidence syntheses. Incorporating partnership values and expectations may result in better uptake, potentially reducing health inequities.

Funding

This project is funded by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Project Grant.

History

Publication Date

2023-08-02

Journal

Systematic Reviews

Volume

12

Article Number

134

Pagination

10p.

Publisher

Springer Nature

ISSN

2046-4053

Rights Statement

© The Author(s) 2023. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Usage metrics

    Journal Articles

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC