posted on 2024-08-28, 02:29authored byDominique A Cadilhac, Andrew Ross, Kathleen L Bagot, Jannette M Blennerhassett, Monique F Kilkenny, Joosup Kim, Tara Purvis, Karen BarclayKaren Barclay, Fiona Ellery, Julie Morrison, Jennifer Cranefield, Timothy J Kleinig, Rohan Grimley, Katherine Jaques, Dana WongDana Wong, Lisa Murphy, Grant Russell, Mark R Nelson, Vincent Thijs, Colin Scott, Sandy Middleton
Background: Stroke affects long-term physical and cognitive function; many survivors report unmet health needs, such as pain or depression. A hospital-led follow-up service designed to address ongoing health problems may avoid unplanned readmissions and improve quality of life. Methods: This paper outlines the protocol for a registry-based, randomised controlled trial with allocation concealment of participants and outcome assessors. Based on an intention-to-treat analysis, we will evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, potential effectiveness and cost implications of a new tailored, codesigned, hospital-led follow-up service for people within 6–12 months of stroke. Participants (n = 100) from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry who report extreme health problems on the EuroQol EQ-5D-3L survey between 90 and 180 days after stroke will be randomly assigned (1:1) to intervention (follow-up service) or control (usual care) groups. All participants will be independently assessed at baseline and 12–14-week post-randomisation. Primary outcomes for feasibility are the proportion of participants completing the trial and for intervention participants the proportion that received follow-up services. Acceptability is satisfaction of clinicians and participants involved in the intervention. Secondary outcomes include effectiveness: change in extreme health problems (EQ-5D-3L), unmet needs (Longer-term Unmet Needs questionnaire), unplanned presentations and hospital readmission, functional independence (modified Rankin Scale) and cost implications estimated from self-reported health service utilisation and productivity (e.g. workforce participation). To inform future research or implementation, the design contains a process evaluation including clinical protocol fidelity and an economic evaluation. Discussion: The results of this study will provide improved knowledge of service design and implementation barriers and facilitators and associated costs and resource implications to inform a future fully powered effectiveness trial of the intervention. Trial registration: ACTRN12622001015730pr. Trial sponsor: Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, 245 Burgundy Street, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, PH: +61 3 9035 7032
Funding
The authors would like to acknowledge the A-LISTS working group members and people with lived experience of stroke that helped codesign the intervention package that will be used as described in this protocol.DAS:N/A.