La Trobe

Physiological, Perceptual, and Biomechanical Responses to Load Carriage while Walking at Military-Relevant Speeds and Loads—Are There Differences between Males and Females?

Download (956.9 kB)
Version 2 2024-10-17, 03:37
Version 1 2024-08-27, 02:55
journal contribution
posted on 2024-10-17, 03:37 authored by Danielle Vickery-HoweDanielle Vickery-Howe, Ben J Dascombe, Jace R Drain, Anthea ClarkeAnthea Clarke, Brooke Hoolihan, Greg L Carstairs, Anj ReddyAnj Reddy, Kane MiddletonKane Middleton
This study aimed to investigate the physiological, perceptual, and biomechanical differences between male and female soldiers across several military-relevant load and walking speed combinations. Eleven female and twelve male soldiers completed twelve 12 min walking trials at varying speeds (3.5 km·h−1, 5.5 km·h−1, 6.5 km·h−1) and with varying external loads (7.2 kg, 23.2 kg, 35.2 kg). Physiological (indirect calorimetry, heart rate), perceptual (perceived exertion), and biomechanical (spatiotemporal, kinematic, kinetic) outcomes were measured throughout each trial. Females had a lower aerobic capacity and lower body strength than males, which resulted in them working at a greater exercise intensity (%VO2peak and heart rate) but with a lower oxygen pulse. Females demonstrated higher breathing frequency and perceived exertion with specific loads. At selected loads and speeds, frontal and sagittal pelvis, hip, and knee motions and forces were greater for females. Females consistently displayed greater relative stride length and step width. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the importance of tailored interventions, periodisation, and nutritional strategies for female military personnel, given their higher relative work rate and increased injury risk during load carriage tasks. Understanding these differences is crucial for preparing female soldiers for the physical demands of military service.

History

Publication Date

2024-07-01

Journal

Biomechanics

Volume

4

Issue

3

Pagination

382 - 410

Publisher

MDPI

ISSN

2673-7078

Rights Statement

© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Usage metrics

    Journal Articles

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC