La Trobe

Phosphorus uptake benefit for wheat following legume break crops in semi-arid Australian farming systems

Download (642.19 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-05-28, 01:24 authored by Ashlea Doolette, Roger ArmstrongRoger Armstrong, Caixian TangCaixian Tang, Chris Guppy, Sean Mason, Ann McNeill
This field study assessed phosphorus dynamics (crop-P uptake, resin-extractable P in the root-zone, P mobilisation and microbial-P) in break crop-cereal rotation sequences at four Australian semi-arid field sites differing in soil P fertility. Phosphorus mobilisation (9–30 kg P ha −1 ) was apparent under break crops, consistently under canola and peas at three sites with low soil P fertility (i.e. pre-sowing soil resin-extractable P < 20 mg P kg −1 ). Enhanced biological cycling of P (i.e. increased microbial-P) was limited to a low P site in the break crop phase. Phosphorus content of break crop aboveground residues following grain removal was 1–7 kg P ha −1 ; P input was greater (12–18 kg P ha −1 ) where legumes were green/brown manured. Varied residue P input did not result in differences in resin-extractable or microbial-P in soil prior to sowing wheat. Phosphorus uptake was greater for wheat after legume break crops compared to continuous wheat (2.0–4.7 kg P ha −1 ) at all sites, especially where crops were green/brown-manured (3.9–5.9 kg P ha −1 ). Greater P uptake by wheat was associated with increased grain yield at three sites but was not significantly correlated with the quantity of P input from break crop residues at all four sites or with soil mineral nitrogen pre-sowing of wheat at three sites. Break crops can directly contribute to P resource-use efficiency by mobilising residual P from soil but the agronomic significance of P supply from break crop residues to a P uptake benefit for following wheat remains to be elucidated.

Funding

Financial support was provided by GRDC Project UA00119.

History

Publication Date

2019-04-15

Journal

Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

Volume

113

Pagination

20p. (p. 247-266)

Publisher

Springer Nature

ISSN

1385-1314

Rights Statement

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019 This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10705-019-09977-0