La Trobe
- No file added yet -

Perinatal mental health screening for women of refugee background: Addressing a major gap in pregnancy care

Download (755.58 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-02-29, 23:32 authored by SM Willey, ME Gibson, R Blackmore, L Goonetilleke, J McBride, N Highet, N Ball, KM Gray, G Melvin, Leanne BoydLeanne Boyd, Christine EastChristine East, JA Boyle
Background: Perinatal mental health disorders affect up to 20% of all women. Women of refugee background are likely to be at increased risk, yet little research has explored this. This study aimed to assess if women of refugee background are more likely to screen risk positive for depression and anxiety than non-refugee women, using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS); and if screening in pregnancy using the EPDS enables better detection of depression and anxiety symptoms in women of refugee background than routine care. Methods: This implementation study was conducted at an antenatal clinic in Melbourne, Australia. Women of refugee and non-refugee backgrounds were screened for depression using English or translated versions of the EPDS and a psychosocial assessment on a digital platform. The psychosocial assessment records of 34 women of refugee background receiving routine care (no screening) were audited. Results: Overall, 274 women completed the EPDS; 43% of refugee background. A similar proportion of women of refugee and non-refugee backgrounds had EPDS scores of ≥9 (39% vs. 40% p = 0.93). Women receiving the combined EPDS and psychosocial screening were more likely to receive a referral for further support than women receiving routine care (41% vs. 18%, p = 0.012). Conclusion: Similarly, high proportions of women of refugee and non-refugee backgrounds were at increased risk of experiencing a current depressive disorder in early pregnancy, suggesting pregnancy care systems should acknowledge and respond to the mental health needs of these women. Screening appeared to facilitate the identification and referral of women compared to routine care.

Funding

This research received funding from Monash Health and a Monash University Faculty Strategic Grant. SW is supported by a scholarship from the Cabrini Foundation. JB was funded by a NHMRC career development fellowship, MGH by a NHMRC Early Career Fellowship, and RB by the Windemere Foundation and Australian Rotary Health.

History

Publication Date

2024-03-01

Journal

Birth

Volume

51

Issue

1

Pagination

13p. (p. 229-241)

Publisher

Wiley

ISSN

0730-7659

Rights Statement

© 2023 The Authors. Birth published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Usage metrics

    Journal Articles

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC