As digital technologies have become ubiquitious in contemporary urban environments, geographers should recognize the co-constitutive role of such technologies in the production of space and highlight the unequal impacts of technologies, infrastructure and code on people's lives. Building on recent developments in digital geography and inequality, this paper highlights highly uneven processes of attunement with technology. Drawing on interviews with people with intellectual disability and urban services staff in Melbourne, Australia, this paper demonstrates that while creating new opportunities for some people with intellectual disability, digitization of services has also produced new barriers to their inclusion in urban spaces. By focusing on three sets of service digitization – electronic payment systems, public transport e-ticketing and public library digitization – we show that the succesfull engagement of people with intellectual disability with digital technologies depends on the alignment of diverse components such as the person's skills and economic resources, the availability and skills of both disability support staff and urban service staff, and favourable responses of bystanders. We argue that the multifaceted alignment that is required for the use of digitized services for people with intellectual disability creates high risk of exclusion as digital delivery is increasingly becoming the default mode for many services. Attention to moments of friction and alignment must be central in future thinking about inequality in digital geography.
Funding
The Disability Inclusive City | Australian Research Council (ARC) - Discovery Projects | DP180102191
History
Publication Date
2021-02-01
Journal
Geoforum
Volume
119
Pagination
(p. 133-142)
Publisher
Elsevier BV
ISSN
0016-7185
Rights Statement
The Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.