posted on 2021-10-07, 04:25authored byEC Kranzler, JS Olson, HM Nichols, Eva YuenEva Yuen, S McManus, JS Buzaglo, AK Zaleta
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) often requires consideration of multiple treatment options. Shared decision-making (SDM) is important, given the availability of increasingly novel therapies; however, patient–provider treatment conversations vary. We examined relationships between patient–provider discussions of new CLL treatment options and sociodemographic, clinical, and patient–provider communication variables among 187 CLL patients enrolled in Cancer Support Community’s Cancer Experience Registry. Factors significantly associated with self-reports of whether patients’ providers discussed new CLL treatment options with them were examined using χ2 tests, t tests, and hierarchical logistic regression. Fifty-eight percent of patients reported discussing new treatment options with their doctor. Patients with higher education were 3 times more likely to discuss new treatment options relative to those with lower education (OR = 3.06, P <.05). Patients who experienced a cancer recurrence were 7 times more likely to discuss new treatment options compared to those who had not (OR = 7.01, P <.05). Findings offer insights into the correlates of patient–provider discussions of new CLL treatment options. As novel therapies are incorporated into standards of care, opportunities exist for providers to improve patient care through enhanced SDM.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by AstraZeneca. Funding for the Cancer Experience Registry was provided by AstraZeneca, Genentech Inc, Janssen Oncology, Novartis, and Pharmacyclics, Inc
History
Publication Date
2021-08-25
Journal
Journal of Patient Experience
Volume
8
Article Number
23743735211034967
Pagination
8p.
Publisher
SAGE
ISSN
2374-3735
Rights Statement
The Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.