<p>Background: This study aimed to evaluate the safety of an orthoptist-led
glaucoma monitoring clinic in a tertiary hospital in Victoria, Australia, by
reviewing the agreement between orthoptists and an experienced ophthalmologist
in the clinical management decision.</p>
<p>Methods: A random sample of patient encounters which occurred
during an 11-month period in an orthoptist-led Glaucoma Monitoring Clinic (GMC)
at a tertiary hospital were randomly selected. Electronic medical records were
deidentified and retrospectively reviewed by a senior consultant ophthalmologist
with the clinical decision and review removed. Agreement between the clinical
management decisions made by two orthoptists with a special interest in
glaucoma and the ophthalmologist were analysed.</p>
<p>Results: When comparing agreement between the orthoptists and
the ophthalmologist, agreement was noted for 18 of the 21 (85.71%) patient
encounters. A kappa analysis showed substantial agreement for the clinical
management decisions of patients diagnosed with a glaucoma (κ = 0.690; 95% CI
0.369 – 1.011). In addition, agreement was strong for the timing of the
follow-up review with 13 of the 18 (72.2%) encounters in agreement (κ = 0.639;
95% CI 0.388 – 0.890).</p>
Conclusion: Substantial agreement was found
between orthoptists and an ophthalmologist in the management of patients who
were suspected of glaucoma or diagnosed with stable primary open angle glaucoma
or ocular hypertension. This suggests that there may be a role for trained
orthoptists in the screening and monitoring of glaucoma patients.<p></p>
History
Publication Date
2021-01-01
Journal
Australian Orthoptic Journal
Volume
53
Pagination
9-15
Publisher
Orthoptics Australia
ISSN
0814-0936
Rights Statement
“Orthoptics Australia is committed to supporting research and open access to publications through the Australian Orthoptic Journal, thereby allowing wide dissemination of academic and clinical work. All digital content produced by the Australian Orthoptic Journal is made available under Creative Commons Licences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ and copyright stays with the author/s who decide how others can reuse their work.”