La Trobe

Optimising desired gain indices to maximise selection response

Download (899.79 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-08-21, 01:17 authored by Reem Joukhadar, Yongjun Li, Rebecca Thistlethwaite, Kerrie L Forrest, Josquin TibbitsJosquin Tibbits, Richard Trethowan, Matthew HaydenMatthew Hayden
Introduction: In plant breeding, we often aim to improve multiple traits at once. However, without knowing the economic value of each trait, it is hard to decide which traits to focus on. This is where “desired gain selection indices” come in handy, which can yield optimal gains in each trait based on the breeder’s prioritisation of desired improvements when economic weights are not available. However, they lack the ability to maximise the selection response and determine the correlation between the index and net genetic merit. Methods: Here, we report the development of an iterative desired gain selection index method that optimises the sampling of the desired gain values to achieve a targeted or a user-specified selection response for multiple traits. This targeted selection response can be constrained or unconstrained for either a subset or all the studied traits. Results: We tested the method using genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) for seven traits in a bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) reference breeding population comprising 3,331 lines and achieved prediction accuracies ranging between 0.29 and 0.47 across the seven traits. The indices were validated using 3,005 double haploid lines that were derived from crosses between parents selected from the reference population. We tested three user-specified response scenarios: a constrained equal weight (INDEX1), a constrained yield dominant weight (INDEX2), and an unconstrained weight (INDEX3). Our method achieved an equivalent response to the user-specified selection response when constraining a set of traits, and this response was much better than the response of the traditional desired gain selection indices method without iteration. Interestingly, when using unconstrained weight, our iterative method maximised the selection response and shifted the average GEBVs of the selection candidates towards the desired direction. Discussion: Our results show that the method is an optimal choice not only when economic weights are unavailable, but also when constraining the selection response is an unfavourable option.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the University of Sydney, and Agriculture Victoria. The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Grains Research and Development Corporation.

History

Publication Date

2024-06-24

Journal

Frontiers in Plant Science

Volume

15

Article Number

1337388

Pagination

10p.

Publisher

Frontiers Media S.A.

ISSN

1664-462X

Rights Statement

© 2024 Joukhadar, Li, Thistlethwaite, Forrest, Tibbits, Trethowan and Hayden. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Usage metrics

    Journal Articles

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC