La Trobe
journal.pcbi.1008763.pdf (3.45 MB)

Optimal timing of one-shot interventions for epidemic control

Download (3.45 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 12.04.2021, 04:55 by Francesco Di Lauro, Istvan Z Kiss, Joel Miller
The interventions and outcomes in the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic are highly varied. The disease and the interventions both impose costs and harm on society. Some interventions with particularly high costs may only be implemented briefly. The design of optimal policy requires consideration of many intervention scenarios. In this paper we investigate the optimal timing of interventions that are not sustainable for a long period. Specifically, we look at at the impact of a single short-term non-repeated intervention (a “one-shot intervention”) on an epidemic and consider the impact of the intervention’s timing. To minimize the total number infected, the intervention should start close to the peak so that there is minimal rebound once the intervention is stopped. To minimise the peak prevalence, it should start earlier, leading to initial reduction and then having a rebound to the same prevalence as the pre-intervention peak rather than one very large peak. To delay infections as much as possible (as might be appropriate if we expect improved interventions or treatments to be developed), earlier interventions have clear benefit. In populations with distinct subgroups, synchronized interventions are less effective than targeting the interventions in each subcommunity separately.


IZK and FD acknowledge support from the Leverhulme Trust the Research Project Grant RPG-2017-370. JCM acknowledges startup funding from La Trobe University funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Publication Date



PLOS Computational Biology





Article Number








Rights Statement

The Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.