File(s) under permanent embargo
Mortality Salience and Cultural Cringe: The Australian Way of Responding to Thoughts of Death
Version 2 2021-04-16, 01:15
Version 1 2021-03-31, 04:53
journal contributionposted on 2021-04-16, 01:15 authored by Emiko KashimaEmiko Kashima, R Beatson, L Kaufmann, S Branchflower, Mathew MarquesMathew Marques
© The Author(s) 2014.
Kashima ES, Beatson R, Kaufmann L, Branchflower S, Marques MD. Mortality Salience and Cultural Cringe: The Australian Way of Responding to Thoughts of Death. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2014;45(10):1534-1548. doi:10.1177/0022022114543521
Terror Management Theory predicts that mortality salience (MS) instigates cultural worldview defenses, especially among individuals with lower self-esteem. That MS intensifies positive evaluations of pro-U.S. essay authors, and negative evaluations of anti-U.S. essay authors have been documented as supportive evidence. However, the evidence to date may have been limited to where praising for the former and rejection of the latter authors is consistent with a shared cultural script and thus normative. In the case of Australian people, the cultural script of cringe prescribes them to evaluate their country modestly and to reject high praise of their country. We therefore predicted that MS (vs. control) should lead Australians, with low self-esteem in particular, to evaluate pro-Australia essay authors less positively while not affecting their evaluations of anti-Australia essay authors. Results from two studies were consistent with this prediction. It is important to distinguish MS effects on adherence to cultural norms from those on reaffirming collective self-esteem, and to consider relevant cultural scripts when interpreting evidence for worldview defenses.
JournalJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Pagination15p. (p. 1534-1548)
PublisherSAGE Publications (UK and US)
Rights StatementThe Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.
CategoriesNo categories selected