Version 2 2021-01-21, 05:36Version 2 2021-01-21, 05:36
Version 1 2021-01-20, 05:42Version 1 2021-01-20, 05:42
journal contribution
posted on 2021-01-21, 05:35authored byDerek L Choi-Lundberg, Hayder Al-AubaidyHayder Al-Aubaidy, John R Burgess, Christine A Clifford, William A Cuellar, Judi A Errey, Amanda J Harper, Roslyn C Malley, Renee M Ross, Anne-Marie M Williams, Richard Hays
Introduction: Various pressures exist for curricular change, including economic forces, burgeoning knowledge, broadening learning outcomes, and improving quality and outcomes of learning experiences. In an Australian 5-year undergraduate medical course, staff were asked to reduce teaching hours by 20% to alleviate perceived overcrowded preclinical curriculum, achieve operating efficiencies and liberate time for students’ self-directed learning. Methods: A case study design with mixed methods was used to evaluate outcomes. Results: Teaching hours were reduced by 198 hours (14%) overall, lectures by 153 hours (19%) and other learning activities by 45 hours (7%). Summative assessment scores did not change significantly after the reductions: 0.4% increase, 1.5% decrease and 1.7% increase in Years 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The percentage of students successfully completing their academic year did not change significantly: 94.4% before and 93.3% after the reductions. Student evaluations from eVALUate surveys changed little, except workload was perceived to be more reasonable. Conclusions: Teaching hours, particularly lectures, can be moderately reduced with little impact on student learning outcomes or satisfaction with an undergraduate medical course.
History
Publication Date
2020-01-01
Journal
Medical Teacher
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pagination
8p. (p. 58-65)
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
ISSN
0142-159X
Rights Statement
The Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.