La Trobe

Life cycle, competitive strategy, continuous innovation and firm performance

Download (456.55 kB)
Version 3 2022-06-30, 05:56
Version 2 2022-06-29, 06:58
Version 1 2022-06-29, 06:52
journal contribution
posted on 2022-06-30, 05:56 authored by Duan Haiyan, Kamran AhmedKamran Ahmed, Marthin NanereMarthin Nanere
Based on the life cycle, competitive strategy and continuous innovation theory, we empirically examine how life cycle and competitive strategy affect firms' continuous innovation in China. The results show that declining firms tend to engage in less continuous innovation compared with growing or mature firms, which are more inclined to engage in continuous innovations. Results have also indicated that firms with offensive strategy engage in more continuous innovation compared with those following defensive strategy. Surprisingly, continuous innovation has a significant negative effect on business performance in different dimensions, such as return on assets, operating profit margin and enterprise value. Considering that the effect of continuous innovation on enterprise business performance may not be evident during the same financial period, we further examined the effects of continuous innovation on firms' assets return ratio, operating profit ratio and enterprise value over 1-5 years ahead. However, we do not find continuous innovation having any positive effects on business performance.

History

Publication Date

2021-01-01

Journal

International Journal of Innovation Management

Volume

25

Issue

1

Article Number

2150004

Pagination

23p.

Publisher

World Scientific Publishing Europe Ltd.

ISSN

1363-9196

Rights Statement

Electronic version of an article published as LIFE CYCLE, COMPETITIVE STRATEGY, CONTINUOUS INNOVATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE in International Journal of Innovation Management 2021 25:01 https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919621500043 © World Scientific Publishing Europe Ltd. https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1363919621500043