File(s) stored somewhere else
Please note: Linked content is NOT stored on La Trobe and we can't guarantee its availability, quality, security or accept any liability.
Instrumenting gait assessment using the Kinect in people living with stroke: Reliability and association with balance tests
journal contributionposted on 12.01.2021, 00:40 by RA Clark, S Vernon, Benjamin Mentiplay, KJ Miller, JL McGinley, YH Pua, K Paterson, KJ Bower
BACKGROUND: The Microsoft Kinect has been used previously to assess spatiotemporal aspects of gait; however the reliability of this system for the assessment of people following stroke has not been established. This study examined the reliability and additional information that the Kinect provides when instrumenting a gait assessment in people living with stroke.METHODS: The spatiotemporal variables of step length, step length asymmetry, foot swing velocity, foot swing velocity asymmetry, peak and mean gait speed and the percentage difference between the peak and mean gait speed were assessed during gait trials in 30 outpatients more than three months post-stroke and able to stand unsupported. Additional clinical assessments of functional reach (FR), step test (ST), 10 m walk test (10MWT) and the timed up and go (TUG) were performed, along with force platform instrumented assessments of center of pressure path length velocity during double-legged standing balance with eyes closed (DLEC), weight bearing asymmetry (WBA) and dynamic medial-lateral weight-shifting ability (MLWS). These tests were performed on two separate occasions, seven days apart for reliability assessment. Separate adjusted multiple regressions models for predicting scores on the clinical and force platform assessments were created using 1) the easily assessed clinically-derived gait variables 10MWT time and total number of steps; and 2) the Kinect-derived variables which were found to be reliable (ICC > 0.75) and not strongly correlated (Spearman's ρ < 0.80) with each other (i.e. non-redundant).RESULTS: Kinect-derived variables were found to be highly reliable (all ICCs > 0.80), but many were redundant. The final regression model using Kinect-derived variables consisted of the asymmetry scores, mean gait velocity, affected limb foot swing velocity and the difference between peak and mean gait velocity. In comparison with the clinically-derived regression model, the Kinect-derived model accounted for >15% more variance on the MLWS, ST and FR tests and scored similarly on all other measures.CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, instrumenting gait using the Kinect is reliable and provides insight into the dynamic balance capacity of people living with stroke. This system provides a minimally intrusive method of examining potentially important gait characteristics in people living with stroke.
The authors would like to thank the Royal Melbourne Hospital for their assistance with the study. This project was partially supported by a National Stroke Foundation Research Honours Grant.
JournalJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Rights StatementThe Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.
Science & TechnologyTechnologyLife Sciences & BiomedicineEngineering, BiomedicalNeurosciencesRehabilitationEngineeringNeurosciences & NeurologyMeasurementBrain injuryWalking10 meter walk testRANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALWEIGHT-BEARING ASYMMETRYINPATIENT REHABILITATIONMICROSOFT KINECTWALKINGPOSTSTROKEFEASIBILITYINDIVIDUALSPARAMETERSVALIDITYHumansGait Disorders, NeurologicExercise TestGaitMultivariate AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesStrokePostural BalanceStroke Rehabilitation