La Trobe
1228079_Haintz,G_2023.pdf (246.46 kB)

Inclusive Policy? An Intersectional Analysis of Policy Influencing Women’s Reproductive Decision‐Making

Download (246.46 kB)
Version 2 2023-05-25, 23:10
Version 1 2023-05-09, 06:17
journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-25, 23:10 authored by Greer Lamaro Haintz, Hayley McKenzie, Elizabeth TurnbullElizabeth Turnbull, Melissa GrahamMelissa Graham
Policy can be used and experienced as a tool for social inclusion or exclusion; it can empower or disenfranchise. Women’s reproductive decision‐making and health is impacted by policy, and women’s experiences of diverse and intersecting marginalised social locations can influence their experiences of policy. This research aimed to explore how intersectionality is considered within Victorian state government policies that influence and impact women’s reproductive decision-making. A systematic search of Victorian (Australia) government policy instruments was undertaken, identifying twenty policy instruments. Policies were analysed using an intersectional policy analysis framework using a two‐stage process involving deductive coding into the domains of the framework, followed by inductive thematic analysis within and across domains. Findings reveal inconsistencies within and across policies in how they consider intersecting social relations of power in the representation of problems, women’s positionings, policy impacts, and policy solutions. These gaps could exclude and marginalise individuals and groups and contribute to systemic inequities in women’s reproductive decision-making and the outcomes of those decisions, particularly among already marginalised groups. The lack of women’s voices in policy further excludes and marginalises those impacted by the policy and limits the representation of all women in policy. Policy development needs to meaningfully involve women with diverse and intersecting marginalised social locations, and critical reflexivity of all stakeholders, to ensure policies can better account for the experiences of, and impacts upon, women who are marginalised and effect change to promote social inclusion and equity in women’s reproductive decision‐making.

History

Publication Date

2023-04-27

Journal

Social Inclusion

Volume

11

Issue

2

Pagination

12p. (p124-135)

Publisher

Cogitatio

ISSN

2183-2803

Rights Statement

© 2023 by the author(s); licensee Cogitatio Press (Lisbon, Portugal). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY).

Usage metrics

    Journal Articles

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC