La Trobe

Homologous peptides derived from influenza A, B and C viruses induce variable CD8(+) T cell responses with cross-reactive potential

Download (2.44 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-08, 01:48 authored by Andrea NguyenAndrea Nguyen, Hiu Ming Peter Lau, Hannah Sloane, Dhilshan Jayasinghe, Nicole A Mifsud, Dimitra ChatzileontiadouDimitra Chatzileontiadou, Emma GrantEmma Grant, Christopher SzetoChristopher Szeto, Stephanie GrasStephanie Gras
Objective: Influenza A, B and C viruses (IAV, IBV and ICV, respectively) circulate globally, infecting humans and causing widespread morbidity and mortality. Here, we investigate the T cell response towards an immunodominant IAV epitope, NP265-273, and its IBV and ICV homologues, presented by HLA-A*03:01 molecule expressed in ~ 4% of the global population (~ 300 million people). Methods: We assessed the magnitude (tetramer staining) and quality of the CD8+ T cell response (intracellular cytokine staining) towards NP265-IAV and described the T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire used to recognise this immunodominant epitope. We next assessed the immunogenicity of NP265-IAV homologue peptides from IBV and ICV and the ability of CD8+ T cells to cross-react towards these homologous peptides. Furthermore, we determined the structures of NP265-IAV and NP323-IBV peptides in complex with HLA-A*03:01 by X-ray crystallography. Results: Our study provides a detailed characterisation of the CD8+ T cell response towards NP265-IAV and its IBV and ICV homologues. The data revealed a diverse repertoire for NP265-IAV that is associated with superior anti-viral protection. Evidence of cross-reactivity between the three different influenza virus strain-derived epitopes was observed, indicating the discovery of a potential vaccination target that is broad enough to cover all three influenza strains. Conclusion: We show that while there is a potential to cross-protect against distinct influenza virus lineages, the T cell response was stronger against the IAV peptide than IBV or ICV, which is an important consideration when choosing targets for future vaccine design.

Funding

The authors thank Monash Facilities (Flow Core, Macromolecular Crystallisation Facility, Micromon sequencing Facility); Victorian Transplantation and Immunogenetics Service (VTIS, Melbourne, Australia), Melbourne, for HLA Typing; Professor Kedzierska (Peter Doherty Institute, Melbourne) for reagents; and MX team for assistance at the Australian Synchrotron. This research was undertaken in part using the MX2 beamline at the Australian Synchrotron, part of ANSTO, and made use of the Australian Cancer Research Foundation (ACRF) detector. The authors thank all the blood donors who took part in this study. This work was supported by the Australian Research Council (ARC) and National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). ATN is supported by an AINSE Postgraduate Research Award, HS was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship, EJG was supported by an NHMRC CJ Martin Fellowship (#1110429) and is supported by an Australian Research Council DECRA (DE210101479) and an AINSE Early Career Researcher Grant, and SG is supported by an NHMRC SRF (#1159272).

History

Publication Date

2022-10-19

Journal

Clinical and Translational Immunology

Volume

11

Issue

10

Article Number

ARTN e1422

Pagination

17p. (p. 1-17)

Publisher

Wiley

ISSN

2050-0068

Rights Statement

© 2022 The Authors. Clinical & Translational Immunology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian and New Zealand Society for Immunology, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Usage metrics

    Journal Articles

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC