La Trobe

Examining beverage-specific trends in youth drinking in Australia before and after the implementation of the alcopops tax

Download (258.44 kB)
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Mojica-Perez, Y., Callinan, S. and Livingston, M. (2020), Examining beverage-specific trends in youth drinking in Australia before and after the implementation of the alcopops tax. Drug Alcohol Rev., 39: 246-254. https://doi-org.ez.library.latrobe.edu.au/10.1111/dar.13038, which has been published in final form at https://doi-org.ez.library.latrobe.edu.au/10.1111/dar.13038.
Introduction and Aims: Alcohol consumption among young Australians has declined markedly since the early 2000s. As yet, there has been no data on how this decline has been spread across different beverages and instead high-level survey data with significant potential for recall and other bias has been used. Trends in beverage choice among young people following an increase in the ‘alcopops’ tax have also not received much attention. Design and Methods: Data on ‘yesterday’ drinking occasions were obtained from five waves (2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016) of the National Drug Strategy Household Survey. A total of 23 536 respondents aged 14–29 years were included in this study. Descriptive and regression analyses were conducted to explore trends in alcohol consumption and changes in beverage preferences. Results: Youth drinking declined by 45% across the study period, with declines of 66% in premix, 48% in spirits, 46% in beer and 33% in wine. Consumption of premix was significantly lower in 2013 and 2016 compared to 2007 amongst the overall sample, males, females, respondents aged 14–21 and 22–29 years, light and heavy drinkers. Significant reductions were also observed in the consumption of premix immediately following the tax (2010) for the younger age group, males and light drinkers. Discussion and Conclusions: Youth consumption of alcohol has declined during the study period with significant variation across beverage types. We found some evidence of a separate impact for the alcopops tax, although for some groups, declines in premix consumption occurred well after the implementation of the tax.

Funding

Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Early Career Research Award. Grant Number: DE180100016; Australian Research Council's Discovery Projects. Grant Number: DP150101024; National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Career Development Fellowship. Grant Number: 1123840; Foundation for Alcohol Research and Education

History

Publication Date

2020-03-01

Journal

Drug and Alcohol Review

Volume

39

Issue

3

Pagination

9p. (p. 246-254)

Publisher

Wiley

ISSN

0959-5236

Rights Statement

This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.

Usage metrics

    Journal Articles

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC