posted on 2021-05-13, 23:30authored byKimia Haji Amou Assar, Serter Atabay, Abdullah YilmazAbdullah Yilmaz, Kazi Parvez Fattah
A simple empirical method is proposed for computing the backwater level for different bridge shapes and crossings in compound channels. A series of parametric studies was conducted on the influence of the Froude number, opening ratio, discharge and roughness coefficient on the backwater depth. The results of the parametric studies, along with multiple regression analysis, were used to derive a simple accurate mathematical model for computing backwater depth. The proposed method was first compared with the energy method for different skew angles and roughness cases. Comparison of the results of the proposed method and the energy method showed good correlations. The proposed method was also validated by comparing its results with experimental data for normal and skewed crossings at 30° and 45°. The overall absolute average percentage difference between the proposed method and the experimental data was found to be 5.1%, while the overall root mean square error was found to be 0.008.
Funding
The work in this paper was supported, in part, by the Open Access Program of the American University of Sharjah. This paper represents the opinions of the authors and does not represent the position or opinions of the American University of Sharjah.
History
Publication Date
2021-02-01
Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Water Management
Volume
174
Issue
1
Pagination
9pp. (p.42-50)
Publisher
Thomas Telford Services Ltd
ISSN
1741-7589
Rights Statement
The Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.