La Trobe

Ecological strategies of (pl)ants: Towards a world-wide worker economic spectrum for ants

Download (2.1 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-08-21, 00:49 authored by Heloise GibbHeloise Gibb, TR Bishop, Lily LeahyLily Leahy, CL Parr, JP Lessard, NJ Sanders, JZ Shik, J Ibarra-Isassi, A Narendra, RR Dunn, IJ Wright
Current global challenges call for a rigorously predictive ecology. Our understanding of ecological strategies, imputed through suites of measurable functional traits, comes from decades of work that largely focussed on plants. However, a key question is whether plant ecological strategies resemble those of other organisms. Among animals, ants have long been recognised to possess similarities with plants: as (largely) central place foragers. For example, individual ant workers play similar foraging roles to plant leaves and roots and are similarly expendable. Frameworks that aim to understand plant ecological strategies through key functional traits, such as the ‘leaf economics spectrum’, offer the potential for significant parallels with ant ecological strategies. Here, we explore these parallels across several proposed ecological strategy dimensions, including an ‘economic spectrum’, propagule size-number trade-offs, apparency-defence trade-offs, resource acquisition trade-offs and stress-tolerance trade-offs. We also highlight where ecological strategies may differ between plants and ants. Furthermore, we consider how these strategies play out among the different modules of eusocial organisms, where selective forces act on the worker and reproductive castes, as well as the colony. Finally, we suggest future directions for ecological strategy research, including highlighting the availability of data and traits that may be more difficult to measure, but should receive more attention in future to better understand the ecological strategies of ants. The unique biology of eusocial organisms provides an unrivalled opportunity to bridge the gap in our understanding of ecological strategies in plants and animals and we hope that this perspective will ignite further interest. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Funding

H.G. and I.J.W. were funded by the Australian Research Council (DP210101630), J.Z.S. was funded by a European Research Council Starting Grant (ELEVATE: ERC-2017-STG-757810); T.R.B. was funded by the Leverhulme Trust (ECF-2017-208); JPL was supported by a NSERC Discovery Grant (RGPIN-2015-06081) and the Concordia University Research Chair in Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function; J.I.-I. was funded by NSERC-CREATE in Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services and Sustainability (BESS).

History

Publication Date

2023-01-01

Journal

Functional Ecology

Volume

37

Issue

1

Pagination

13p. (p. 13-25)

Publisher

Wiley

ISSN

0269-8463

Rights Statement

© 2022 The Authors. Functional Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Usage metrics

    Journal Articles

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC