La Trobe

Discriminating the earliest stages of mammary carcinoma using myoepithelial and proliferative markers

Download (12.83 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-15, 06:23 authored by Hendrika M Duivenvoorden, Alex Spurling, Sandra A O'Toole, Belinda ParkerBelinda Parker
Mammographic screening has led to increased detection of breast cancer at a pre-invasive state, hence modelling the earliest stages of breast cancer invasion is important in defining candidate biomarkers to predict risk of relapse. Discrimination of pre-invasive from invasive lesions is critically important for such studies. Myoepithelial cells are the barrier between epithelial cells and the surrounding stroma in the breast ductal system. A number of myoepithelial immunohistochemistry markers have been identified and validated in human tissue for use by pathologists as diagnostic tools to distinguish in situ carcinoma from invasive breast cancer. However, robust myoepithelial markers for mouse mammary tissue have been largely under-utilised. Here, we investigated the utility of the myoepithelial markers smooth muscle actin (SMA), smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SMMHC), cytokeratin-14 (CK14) and p63 to discriminate mammary intraepithelial neoplasia (MIN) from invasive disease in the C57BL/ 6J MMTV-PyMT transgenic model of mammary carcinoma. We identified that SMMHC and CK14 are retained in early in situ neoplasia and are appropriate markers for distinguishing MIN from invasive disease in this model. Additionally, the proliferation marker Ki67 is a superior marker for differentiating between normal and hyperplastic ducts, prior to the development of MIN. Based on this, we developed a scoring matrix for discriminating normal, hyperplasia, MIN and invasive lesions in this spontaneous mammary tumorigenesis model. This study demonstrates heterogeneous expression of myoepithelial proteins throughout tumour development, and highlights the need to characterise the most appropriate markers in other models of early breast cancer to allow accurate classification of disease state.

Funding

This work was supported by grant funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) (BSP 1047748 and 1127754) to BSP; fellowship support to BSP from Victorian Cancer Agency, SAOT from National Breast Cancer Foundation (Practitioner Fellowship PRAC-16-006) and HMD from Cancer Council Victoria. Support from the Sydney Breast Cancer Foundation is also gratefully acknowledged. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Clinical Labs provided support in the form of salaries for author SAOT, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.

History

Publication Date

2018-07-25

Journal

PLoS One

Volume

13

Issue

7

Article Number

e0201370

Pagination

12p. (p. 1-12)

Publisher

PLOS

ISSN

1932-6203

Rights Statement

© 2018 Duivenvoorden et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Usage metrics

    Journal Articles

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC