La Trobe
- No file added yet -

Comparison of measures of ability in adolescents with intellectual disability

Download (259.31 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-03-23, 04:11 authored by C Mungkhetklang, Sheila CrewtherSheila Crewther, Edith BavinEdith Bavin, Nahal Goharpey, C Parsons
Finding the most appropriate intelligence test for adolescents with Intellectual Disability (ID) is challenging given their limited language, attention, perceptual, and motor skills and ability to stay on task. The study compared performance of 23 adolescents with ID on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition (WISC-IV), one of the most widely used intelligence tests, and three non-verbal IQ tests, the Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices (RCPM), the Test of Non-verbal Intelligence-Fourth Edition and the Wechsler Non-verbal test of Ability. Results showed that the WISC-IV Full Scale IQ raw and scaled scores were highly correlated with total scores from the three non-verbal tests, although the correlations were higher for raw scores, suggesting they may lead to better understanding of within group differences and what individuals with ID can do at the time of assessment. All participants attempted more questions on the non-verbal tests than the verbal. A preliminary analysis showed that adolescents with ID without ASD (n = 15) achieved higher scores overall than those presenting with ID+ASD (n = 8). Our findings support the view that short non-verbal tests are more likely to give a similar IQ result as obtained from the WISC-IV. In terms of the time to administer and the stress for participants, they are more appropriate for assessing adolescents with ID.

Funding

The first author was supported by a Royal Thai Government PhD Scholarship and additional funds were provided by the School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University.

History

Publication Date

2016-05-17

Journal

Frontiers in Psychology

Volume

7

Issue

MAY

Article Number

683

Pagination

11p.

Publisher

Frontiers

ISSN

1664-1078

Rights Statement

© 2016 Mungkhetklang, Crewther, Bavin, Goharpey and Parsons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.