La Trobe
2018 Bigby et al Comparing costs and outcomes of supported living with group homes in Australia.pdf (1.54 MB)

Comparing costs and outcomes of supported living with group homes in Australia

Download (1.54 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2020-11-13, 03:21 authored by Christine BigbyChristine Bigby, Emma BouldEmma Bould, Julie Beadle-Brown
© 2017 The Author(s).

Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Background: Supported living is perceived as more flexible than group homes for people with intellectual disability. This study identified costs and factors associated with quality of life (QOL) in supported living and compared this with group homes. Method: Thirty-one residents in supported living participated in a survey incorporating measures of service user characteristics and QOL. Participants in supported living were compared to a sample of 397 people in 96 group homes, and QOL outcomes compared for a matched sample of 29 people in supported living and group homes. Results: QOL differed little, supported living was cheaper, and 30–35% of both groups had similar support needs. Being younger, having autism, better health, family support, and participation in structured activities were associated with better outcomes in supported living. Conclusions: Supported living holds potential for group home residents, but greater support is required in domains such as health and interpersonal relationships.


This study was funded with assistance from a funding grant offered under the National Disability Research and Development Agenda, jointly implemented by disability representatives from Commonwealth, State, and Territory governments. However, the information and views contained in this research are not intended as a statement of the Australian Government or any jurisdictional policy, and do not necessarily, or at all, reflect the views held by the Australian Government or jurisdictional government departments.


Publication Date



Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability






13p. (p. 295-307)


Taylor and Francis



Rights Statement

The Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.

Usage metrics

    Journal Articles


    Ref. manager