La Trobe

Biochars and their feedstocks differ in their short-term effects in ameliorating acid soils grown with aluminium-sensitive wheat

Download (445.68 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-05-27, 05:39 authored by Dominic LauricellaDominic Lauricella, Zhe Weng, Gary ClarkGary Clark, Clayton R. Butterly, G Li, C Gazey, Peter Sale, Caixian TangCaixian Tang
Purpose: Biochars have potential to reduce soil acidity and Al3+ toxicity, and increase the availability of soil nutrients. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of biochars and their raw feedstocks in amelioration of soil acidity. Materials and methods: Ten ameliorants comprising of five biochars (pyrolyzed at 550°C) and their corresponding feedstocks (wheat chaff, canola stubble, vetch hay, lucerne pellets, and poultry litter) were added (1% of soil weight) to sandy Tenosol and loamy Chromosol with both having similar Al3+ concentrations but Chromosol having nine times greater pH buffer capacity. The soils with the ameliorants were incubated for 7 weeks (incubation phase), before being planted with an Al-sensitive wheat (ES8) for 18 days (plant phase). Results and discussion: Biochars outperformed their feedstocks in increasing soil pH, leading to a significant reduction of Al3+ toxicity. Biochar additions increased shoot growth by 137‒341% for Tenosol and 10‒295% for Chromosol, whereas their feedstocks increased shoot growth by 25‒233% for Tenosol and -38‒136% for Chromosol. Poultry-litter biochar increased soil pH greater than the corresponding poultry-litter treatments by 1.59 units in the Tenosol and 0.79 units in the Chromosol at the end of the plant phase. In addition, all organic amendments (except wheat-chaff and its biochar) significantly increased shoot P concentrations with poultry-litter biochar achieving the highest Olsen P and shoot P concentrations in both soils. Evidently, high alkalinity and nutrient contents of poultry-litter biochar resulted in the greatest increases in soil pH and shoot biomass in both soils. Conclusions: Biochars were more effective at ameliorating soil acidity than their corresponding feedstocks primarily via increasing soil pH and supplying plant nutrients, depending on soil type. Poultry-litter biochar was the most effective on both soils.

Funding

This research was supported by Australian Postgraduate Award (APA), Securing Food, Water and the Environment top-up scholarship and the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC) Project: DAN00206 Innovative approaches to managing subsoil acidity in the southern grain region.

History

Publication Date

2021-08-01

Journal

Journal of Soils and Sediments

Volume

21

Pagination

2805-2816

Publisher

Springer Nature

ISSN

1439-0108

Rights Statement

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11368-021-03001-1