La Trobe
Attitudes to genetically modified food over time - how trust in organizations and the media cycle predict support.pdf (1.04 MB)

Attitudes to Genetically Modified Food over Time: How Trust in Organizations and the Media Cycle Predict Support

Download (1.04 MB)
Version 2 2021-04-01, 06:36
Version 1 2021-03-31, 04:58
journal contribution
posted on 2021-04-01, 04:22 authored by Mathew MarquesMathew Marques, CR Critchley, J Walshe
© The Author(s) 2014 This research examined public opinion toward genetically modified plants and animals for food, and how trust in organizations and media coverage explained attitudes toward these organisms. Nationally representative samples (N = 8821) over 10 years showed Australians were less positive toward genetically modified animals compared to genetically modified plants for food, especially in years where media coverage was high. Structural equation modeling found that positive attitudes toward different genetically modified organisms for food were significantly associated with higher trust in scientists and regulators (e.g. governments), and with lower trust in watchdogs (e.g. environmental movement). Public trust in scientists and watchdogs was a stronger predictor of attitudes toward the use of genetically modified plants for food than animals, but only when media coverage was low. Results are discussed regarding the moral acceptability of genetically modified organisms for food, the media’s role in shaping public opinion, and the role public trust in organizations has on attitudes toward genetically modified organisms.


The research was funded by the Department of Psychological Sciences and Statistics, Swinburne University.


Publication Date



Public Understanding of Science






18p. (p. 601-618)





Rights Statement

The Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.