Version 2 2021-06-03, 02:45Version 2 2021-06-03, 02:45
Version 1 2021-06-03, 00:54Version 1 2021-06-03, 00:54
journal contribution
posted on 2021-06-03, 02:45authored byJ Rees, SR Bagatini, J Lo, JM Hodgson, CT Christophersen, RM Daly, DJ Magliano, Jonathan ShawJonathan Shaw, M Sim, CP Bondonno, LC Blekkenhorst, JM Dickson, JR Lewis, A Devine
Increasing prevalence of mental health disorders within the Australian population is a serious public health issue. Adequate intake of fruits and vegetables (FV), dietary fibre (DF) and resistant starch (RS) is associated with better mental and physical health. Few longitudinal studies exist exploring the temporal relationship. Using a validated food frequency questionnaire, we examined baseline FV intakes of 5845 Australian adults from the AusDiab study and estimated food group-derived DF and RS using data from the literature. Perceived mental health was assessed at baseline and 5 year follow up using SF-36 mental component summary scores (MCS). We conducted baseline cross-sectional analysis and prospective analysis of baseline dietary intake with perceived mental health at 5 years. Higher baseline FV and FV-derived DF and RS intakes were associated with better 5 year MCS (p < 0.001). A higher FV intake (754 g/d vs. 251 g/d, Q4 vs. Q1) at baseline had 41% lower odds (OR = 0.59: 95% CI 0.46–0.75) of MCS below population average (<47) at 5 year follow up. Findings were similar for FV-derived DF and RS. An inverse association was observed with discretionary food-derived DF and RS. This demonstrates the association between higher intakes of FV and FV-derived DF and RS with better 5 year mental health outcomes. Further RCTs are necessary to understand mechanisms that underlie this association including elucidation of causal effects.
History
Publication Date
2021-05-01
Journal
Nutrients
Volume
13
Issue
5
Article Number
1447
Pagination
(p. 1-18)
Publisher
MDPI
ISSN
2072-6643
Rights Statement
The Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.