La Trobe
1154456_Walsh,W_2020.pdf (212.24 kB)
Download file

Adherence to COREQ Reporting Guidelines for Qualitative Research: A Scientometric Study in Nursing Social Science

Download (212.24 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 21.01.2021, 03:46 by S Walsh, Martin JonesMartin Jones, D Bressington, Lisa McKennaLisa McKenna, E Brown, S Terhaag, Monika ShresthaMonika Shrestha, A Al-Ghareeb, Richard GrayRichard Gray
© The Author(s) 2020. Qualitative research plays an important role in helping us describe, interpret and generate theories about complex phenomena in healthcare. Complete and transparent reporting of research informs readers about the significance and rigor of the work. The aim of this scientometric study was to determine the quality of reporting of qualitative research in nursing social science. Studies were identified by manually searching the table of contents for qualitative papers published in the June (or closest subsequent) 2018 issue of 115 nursing journals. Adherence with the 32-item Consolidated Criteria for REporting Qualitative (COREQ) research was determined for each study by two researchers. Additional information about the study (e.g., sample size, field of nursing) and the publishing journal (e.g., endorsement of COREQ) were also extracted. Using established criteria, COREQ compliance was coded either good (≥ 25 items), moderate (17 to 24), poor (9 to 16), very poor (≤ 8) based on the number of items addressed in each study. One hundred and ninety-seven manuscripts were included. The quality of reporting was generally rated as either moderate (57%) or poor (38%). Journal endorsement of qualitative reporting guidelines was associated with better reporting. The reporting of qualitative research in nursing social science journals is suboptimal. Researchers, authors, reviewers and journal editors need to ensure their papers comprehensively address the requirements of COREQ to ensure comprehensive and transparent reporting of their research.

History

Publication Date

29/12/2020

Journal

International Journal of Qualitative Methods

Volume

19

Article Number

ARTN 1609406920982145

Pagination

9p.

Publisher

SAGE

ISSN

1609-4069

Rights Statement

The Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.