La Trobe

Acceptability and feasibility of recovery-oriented group acceptance and commitment therapy for psychosis in routine practice: an uncontrolled pilot study

Download (163.27 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-09-24, 03:35 authored by John FarhallJohn Farhall, Marilyn CugnettoMarilyn Cugnetto, Eliot Goldstone, Jesse Gates, Jacinta Clemente, Eric MorrisEric Morris
Background: Personal recovery is a persisting concern for people with psychotic disorders. Accordingly, mental health services have adopted frameworks of personal recovery, prioritizing adaptation to psychosis alongside symptom remission. Group acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for psychosis aims to promote personal recovery alongside improved mood and quality of life. Aims: The objectives of this uncontrolled, prospective pilot study were to determine whether 'Recovery ACT' groups for adults are a feasible, acceptable and safe program within public mental health services, and assess effectiveness through measuring changes in personal recovery, wellbeing, and psychological flexibility. Method: Program feasibility, acceptability and safety indicators were collected from referred consumers (n=105). Adults (n=80) diagnosed with psychotic disorders participated in an evaluation of 'Recovery ACT' groups in Australian community public mental health services. Participants completed pre- and post-group measures assessing personal recovery, wellbeing, and psychological flexibility. Results: Of 101 group enrollees, 78.2% attended at least one group session (n=79); 73.8% attended three or more, suggesting feasibility. Eighty of 91 first-time attendees participated in the evaluation. Based on completer analyses (n=39), participants' personal recovery and wellbeing increased post-group. Outcome changes correlated with the linear combination of psychological flexibility measures. Conclusions: 'Recovery ACT' groups are feasible, acceptable and safe in Australian public mental health services. 'Recovery ACT' may improve personal recovery, wellbeing, and psychological flexibility. Uncontrolled study design, completer analyses, and program discontinuation rates limit conclusions.

History

Publication Date

2024-09-01

Journal

Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

Volume

52

Issue

5

Pagination

7p. (p. 535-541)

Publisher

Cambridge University Press

ISSN

1352-4658

Rights Statement

© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that no alterations are made and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use and/or adaptation of the article.

Usage metrics

    Journal Articles

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC