La Trobe

File(s) stored somewhere else

Please note: Linked content is NOT stored on La Trobe and we can't guarantee its availability, quality, security or accept any liability.

A process of decision-making support: Exploring supported decision-making practice in Canada

journal contribution
posted on 2021-07-23, 06:10 authored by M Browning, Christine BigbyChristine Bigby, Jacinta DouglasJacinta Douglas
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Background: Canada was the first country to develop legal mechanisms that allow for supported decision making, and little research has explored how decision making is supported in this context. This research aimed to understand how seven people with intellectual disabilities, living in two Canadian provinces, were supported with their decision making.
Method: The research used constructivist grounded theory methodology, interviewing and observing the decision making of seven people with mild to severe intellectual disabilities and 25 decision supporters.
Results: A common process of decision-making support was discovered, involving dynamic interaction between the person’s will and preferences and supporters’ responses. This interaction was influenced by five factors: the experiences and attributes the person and their supporter brought to the process; the quality of their relationship; the decision-making environment and the nature and consequences of the decision.
Conclusion: The highly individualised and contextually dependent nature of decision-making support has implications for supported decision-making practice.


This research was supported by an Australian postgraduate research scholarship.


Publication Date



Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability








Taylor and Francis



Rights Statement

The Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.