Please note: Linked content is NOT stored on La Trobe and we can't guarantee its availability, quality, security or accept any liability.
A comparison of penalised regression methods for informing the selection of predictive markers
journal contribution
posted on 2021-01-06, 03:40authored byCJ Greenwood, GJ Youssef, P Letcher, JA Macdonald, LJ Hagg, A Sanson, Jennifer McIntoshJennifer McIntosh, DM Hutchinson, JW Toumbourou, M Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Craig A Olsson
Data collection for the ATP study was supported primarily through Australian grants from the Melbourne Royal Children's Hospital Research Foundation, National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council, and the Australian Institute of Family Studies. Funding for this work was supported by grants from the Australian Research Council [DP130101459; DP160103160; DP180102447] and the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [APP1082406]. Olsson, C.A. was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council fellowship (Investigator grant APP1175086). Hutchinson, D.M. was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [APP1197488].The ATP study is located at The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne and is a collaboration between Deakin University, The University of Melbourne, the Australian Institute of Family Studies, The University of New South Wales, The University of Otago (New Zealand), and the Royal Children's Hospital (further information available at www.aifs.gov.au/atp).The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and may not reflect those of their organizational affiliations, nor of other collaborating individuals or organizations. We acknowledge all collaborators who have contributed to the ATP, especially Professors Ann Sanson, Margot Prior, Frank Oberklaid, John Toumbourou and Ms Diana Smart. We would also like to sincerely thank the participating families for their time and invaluable contribution to the study.
History
Publication Date
2020-11-20
Journal
PLoS ONE
Volume
15
Issue
11
Article Number
e0242730
Pagination
14p. (p. 1-14)
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLOS)
ISSN
1932-6203
Rights Statement
The Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.