A Systematic Review of Reciprocal Peer Tutoring within Tertiary Health Profession Educational Programs
journal contribution
posted on 2021-12-20, 06:09authored byS Gazula, Lisa McKennaLisa McKenna, S Cooper, P Paliadelis
Abstract
Introduction: Reciprocal Peer Tutoring (RPT) is a form of collaborative learning that involves students of similar academic
backgrounds experiencing interchanging roles of tutor and learner.
Purpose: Use of RPT has not been explored to the same degree as other forms of peer-assisted learning which may involve
learners of different levels. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the role of RPT in health professions education in
order to identify the benefits and challenges, as well as the best approach for its successful execution.
Method: A search of the literature between January 2005 and February 2016 was conducted using applicable electronic databases
and snowball referencing searches. Methodological quality of the selected studies was ascertained with the use of the Critical
Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist.
Results: Eight articles met the set inclusion criteria for the review. Within these it was found that RPT could potentially enhance
cooperative learning, communication, metacognition and teaching skills apart from enhanced understanding of the topic under study.
Discussion: Whilst RPT has been found to have a positive impact upon learner experiences, further investigation is required
around its use, particularly in assessing learning outcomes in health education programs.
History
Publication Date
2017-12-01
Journal
Health Professions Education
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pagination
15p. (p. 64-78)
Publisher
Elsevier
ISSN
2452-3011
Rights Statement
The Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.