<p>Intra-rater
reliability of the digitisation method involved one blinded investigator (Investigator
A) repeating digitisation on 100 randomly sampled images on two occasions. <a>Three blinded investigators (A, B and C) analysed all 2145
images to provide comparisons for inter-rater reliability of the digitisation
method. </a>The images were divided into images of GM (1081 images) or GL (1064
images), and reliability analyses were performed for these groups separately. For
test-retest reliability of the ultrasound image acquisition and digitisation
method combined, results were re-identified for each of the 87 participants and
separated into image number (1, 2 or 3) and test session (1 or 2). Intra-rater
between-image reliability was measured by comparing Investigator A’s results
from session 1 image 1, to session 1 image 3. <a>Intra-rater-test-retest reliability was determined by comparing Investigator
A’s averages from test session 1 images to test session 2. The average of the
three investigators (A, B and C) results from test session 1 was also compared
against their average of results from test session 2 to determine inter-rater-test-retest reliability.</a></p><br>