The purpose of this paper is twofold: (i) carrying out a preliminary survey of the literature and research projects on Compliance by Design (CbD); and (ii) clarifying the double process of (a) extending business managing techniques to other regulatory fields, and (b) converging trends in legal theory, legal technology and Artificial Intelligence. The paper highlights the connections and differences we found across different domains and proposals. We distinguish three different policydriven types of CbD: (i) business, (ii) regulatory, (iii) and legal. The recent deployment of ethical views, and the implementation of general principles of privacy and data protection lead to the conclusion that, in order to appropriately define legal compliance, Compliance through Design (CtD) should be differentiated from CbD.
Funding
Law and Policy Program of the Australian Government-funded Data to Decisions Cooperative Research Centre (http://www.d2dcrc.com.au/); Meta-Rule of Law DER2016-78108-P, Research of Excellence, Spain.
History
Publication Date
2017-12-13
Proceedings
Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Technologies for Regulatory Compliance co-located with the 30th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX 2017)
Editors
Rodriguez-Doncel V
Casanovas P
Gonzalez-Conejero J
Publisher
CEUR-WS.org
Place of publication
Aachen, Germany
Series
CEUR Workshop Proceedings
Volume
2049
Pagination
17p. (p. 33-49)
ISSN
1613-0073
Name of conference
Workshop on Technologies for Regulatory Compliance