A short note on the Chisholm paradox

Governatori, Guido

doi:10.26181/5fd17b6b6608a

File(s) stored somewhere else

http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2632/MIREL-19_paper_4.pdf

Please note: Linked content is NOT stored on La Trobe and we can't guarantee its availability, quality, security or accept any liability.

A short note on the Chisholm paradox

conference contribution

posted on 2020-12-10, 01:35 authored by Guido Governatori

© 2020 CEUR-WS. All rights reserved. We advance an alternative version of the Chisholm Paradox and we argue that the alternative version (while logically equivalent to the original version), in its manifestation in the natural language, is not intuitively consistent. The alternative version of the paradox suggests some requirements for deontic logics designed for legal reasoning.

History

Publication Date

2020-01-01

Proceedings

Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on MIning and REasoning with Legal texts

Editors

Casini G Di Caro L Governatori G Leone V Markovich R

Publisher

CEUR-WS.org

Place of publication

Spain

Volume

2632

Pagination

7p.

ISSN

1613-0073

Name of conference

Workshop on `MIning and REasoning with Legal texts (MIREL) (2019)

Location

Madrid, Spain

Starting Date

2019-12-11

Finshing Date

2019-12-11

Rights Statement

The Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.